Australian Government sponsored testing confirms improved fuel consumption and emission reductions
BHP Billiton Mount Keith Operations in Western Australia with testing conducted under the supervision of the University of Western Australia report

Source – (link - See Page 10)
Australian Government Department of the Environment
"The Plus Factor" Newsletter - Issue 07 Autumn 2008

Certified Diesel Mechanic and Truck Operator - Is no longer skeptic
       Fuel Efficiency Improved         6% - 9%
Source - (Link)

Canadian Gravel Truck Operation reports improved Fuel Consumption and dramatic Smoke/Emmission Reductions.
      Fuel Efficiency Improved          6% - 7%
      Visiable Smoke Reduction        Over 50%
Source - (link)

Fuel Consumption Comparison
Transit Fleets – Each 6 month test included 32 Buses with Detroit Diesel Engines

Source – (link)
Paper presented by J.B. Parsons
Finning Tractor & Equipment Ltd.
S.A.E. West Coast International Meeting
Vancouver, BC

Fuel Efficiency and Hydrocarbon Mass Emissions
Laidlaw Transit - Fleet of Six School Buses - Independent Testing conducted by Applied Environmental Sciences Inc. Madison Wisconsin.

Source - (link)
"Laidlaw Transit"
Applied Environmental Sciences Inc.
Madison Wisconsin.

Fuel Consumption Comparison
Diesel Railway Locomotives with 12 cylinder 710 EMD Prime Mover and Caterpillar 3412 HEP Engines – Independent Testing using the AAR-RP-503 testing protocol conducted by Engine Systems Development Centre Montreal, Canada.

Comments:

"GO Transit Rail Equipment normally do not entertain the use of fuel additives on our locomotives because they usually have not undergone appropriate testing at a recognized testing facility using the AAR-RP-503 testing protocol and none are recommended by original manufactures of the locomotive or diesel engines. When approached by FPC about six years ago we noted that their product had been tested by the South West Research Centre using the AAR-RP-503 testing protocol and, results indicated fuel savings in the single digit percentage range with no damage to engine components. Also, internal engine parts had less accumulation of carbon deposits resulting from the use of FPC."

Source - (link)
"Go Transit" of Toronto
(Operators of the GO Train network
for the Toronto Transit System)

Exhaust Smoke Reductions and Fuel Efficiency Gain Estimates
24 metre Twin Diesel Catamaran operating of the south coast of Australia.

Comments:

"FTC/FPC Combustion Catalyst is the only fuel chemical yet proven by the world’s leading testing authority, SouthWest Research Institute (SwRI), Texas, USA, to improve fuel efficiency by promoting a faster and more complete combustion. SwRI also determined that FTC does not alter the physical or chemical properties of diesel fuel. SwRI also determined, using the Caterpillar IG2 Test (ASTM 509A) that there are no detrimental effects that could cause increased wear or deposits following FTC treatment of fuel. These findings have been verified by countless field studies in diverse applications which have confirmed efficiency benefits of 3% to 8%. Maintenance Benefits documented include reduced oil wear metal profiles and reduced soot. Combustion and exhaust spaces become essentially free of any hard carbon with continuous catalyst use.

Source - (link)
"Mackenzie Island Cruises"
FTPL Pty Ltd.
Fremantle WA

Test Results for American Railways using RP503 Procedure

    Fuel Performance Average Improvement:   6.35%
    Exhaust Smoke Average Reduction:            25.72%
Source - (link)

Technical Bulliten 115-97

30 Day Fuel Efficiency Tests
Two Mercedes powered Freightliner Highway Tractors.

Source – (link)
Fraley and Shilling Inc


More Testimonials - Please click the links below

Laidlaw Transit Inc.pdf
Mackenzie Island Cruises.pdf
Maritrans Operating Partners.pdf
Vulcan Materials.pdf
Schultz Express.pdf